from chicago sun-times: With Pope Benedict XVI's blessing, the Vatican released a document Tuesday that said the Catholic Church is the one true church and other Christian bodies shouldn't be called churches.
Predictably, the document drew praise from some, while critics called it insensitive and a harsh example of religious intolerance.
But in some Catholic circles, the document was viewed as sort of a Chicago Manual of Style.
"The Vatican is interested in theological precision in using the word 'church,'" said Lawrence Cunningham, a theologian at the University of Notre Dame.
The Rev. James Massa, who heads the U.S. bishops' office for ecumenical and interreligious affairs, insisted the Vatican wasn't building walls, but laying the groundwork for "fruitful" discussions between Catholics and other Christians.
"This clarifies the meaning of certain technical theological terms that had been confusing to scholars," he said. "There's no retreat from ecumenical dialogue nor our love and respect for other Christians."
After 2000 years, were theologians really unclear about the meaning of "church"?
Benedict believed so, scholars said. For him, the battleground was a phrase used in a document of the 1960s Second Vatican Council. It said the church instituted by Jesus and his apostles "subsists in the Catholic Church."
fair use notice: this site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. we are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, & social justice issues, etc. we believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US copyright law. In accordance with title 17 usc section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
2 comments:
"There is no pope" (Gertrude Stein).
this opens up seriously charged areas of discussion. The vatican is dangerous as it seeks to erode our American concept of separation of church and state and dillute our understanding of freedom of religious practice. The Bishop of Rome is in no way an international authority of social organizations (or whatever they may call themselves), and allowing him into the mainstream media flow allows his bigoted and retrogressive perspectives spread like a virus. The true christian message of love, tolerance and peace is lost behind a miasma of power, politics and pesos when it comes to the head bishop. A real, living evil hides behind the chalice raised.
-cs
Post a Comment